# Hydro and MHD Methods¶

There are four available methods in Enzo for calculating the evolution
of the gas with and without magnetic fields. Below is a brief
description of each method, including the parameters associated with
each one and a link to further reading.
For relevant parameters please also see *Hydrodynamics Parameters*.

Additionally, there are two MHD methods, which are described in detail in *MHD Methods*

## Method 0: Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM)¶

*Source: Grid_SolvePPM_DE.C*

The PPM scheme uses a parabolic function to estimate the left and states of the Godunov problem. This more accurately represents both smooth gradients and discontinuities over linear interpolation, i.e. PLM.

### Parameters¶

Main call: `HydroMethod = 0`

`RiemannSolver`: specifies the type of solver, where the following
only works with the PPM solver.

- HLL (Harten-Lax-van Leer) a two-wave, three-state solver with no
resolution of contact waves. This is the most diffusive of the
available three solvers in PPM.
*New for version 2.1*

- HLLC (Harten-Lax-van Leer with Contact) a three-wave, four-state
solver with better resolution of contacts. The most resilient to
rarefaction waves (e.g. blastwave interiors).
*New for version 2.1* **Default**Two-shock approximation. Iterative solver.

`RiemannSolverFallback`: allows for the Riemann solver to “fallback”
to the more diffusive HLL solver when negative energies or densities
are computed. Only applicable when using the HLLC and Two-shock
solvers. The fluxes in the failing cell are recomputed and used in
the Euler update of the gas quantities. *New for version 2.1*

`ConservativeReconstruction`: When interpolating (PPM) to the left
and right states, interpolation occurs in the conserved variables
(density, momentum, and energy) instead of the primitive variables
(density, velocity, and pressure). This results in more accurate
results in unigrid simulations but can cause errors with AMR. See
Section 4.2.2 (steps 1-5) and Appendices A1 and B1 in Stone et
al. (2008, ApJS 178, 137). *New for version 2.1*

`DualEnergyFormalism`: allows the total and thermal energy to be
followed seperately during the simulation. Helpful when the velocities
are high such that E_{total}>> E_{thermal}.

`PPMFlatteningParameter`

`PPMSteepeningParameter`

## Method 2: ZEUS¶

*Source: ZeusSource.C, Zeus_xTransport.C, Zeus_yTransport.C,
Zeus_zTransport.C, Grid_ZeusSolver.C, ZeusUtilities.C*

ZEUS is a finite-difference method of solving hyperbolic PDEs instead of solving the Godunov problem. It is a very robust but relatively diffusive scheme.

### Parameters¶

Main call: `HydroMethod = 2`

`ZEUSQuadraticArtificialViscosity`

`ZEUSLinearArtificialViscosity`

### Links¶

J. M. Stone and M. L. Norman. “Zeus-2D: A radiation
magnetohydrodynamics code for astrophysical flows in two space
dimensions. I. The hydrodynamics algorithms and tests.” *The
Astrophysical Journal Supplement*, 80:753, 1992 link

J. M. Stone and M. L. Norman. “Zeus-2D: A radiation
magnetohydrodynamics code for astrophysical flows in two space
dimensions. II. The magnetohydrodynamic algorithms and tests.” *The
Astrophysical Journal Supplement*, 80:791, 1992 link

## Method 3: MUSCL¶

New in version 2.0.

The MUSCL [1] scheme is a second-order accurate extensive of Godunov’s method for solving the hydrodynamics in one dimension. The implementation in Enzo uses second-order Runge-Kutta time integration. In principle, it can use any number of Riemann solvers and interpolation schemes. Here we list the compatible ones that are currently implemented.

### Parameters¶

Parameter file call: `HydroMethod = 3`

`RiemannSolver`: specifies the type of solver, where the following
only works with the MUSCL solver.

- HLL (Harten-Lax-van Leer): a two-wave, three-state solver with no resolution of contact waves.

- LLF (Local Lax-Friedrichs) is based on central differences instead of a Riemann problem. It requires no characteristic information. This is the most diffusive of the available three solvers in MUSCL.
- HLLC (Harten-Lax-van Leer with Contact): a three-wave, four-state solver with better resolution of contacts. The most resilient to rarefaction waves (e.g. blastwave interiors).

If negative energies or densities are computed, the solution is corrected using a more diffusive solver, where the order in decreasing accuracy is HLLC -> HLL -> LLF.

`ReconstructionMethod`: specifies the type of interpolation scheme
used for the left and right states in the Riemann problem.

- PLM:
**default** - PPM: Currently being developed.

## Method 4: MHD with Hyperbolic Cleaning (Dedner)¶

The two MHD methods in Enzo differ primarily in the mechanism for maintaining

. These are described in more detail in*MHD Methods*

`HydroMethod = 4` uses the hyperbolic cleaning method of Dedner et al. (2002, JCP 175, 645). The basic
integration is the MUSCL 2nd order Runga Kutta method described above. As
`HydroMethod = 3`, there are three Riemann solver options, though instead of
HLLC, HLLD is available

- HLL (Harten-Lax-van Leer): a two-wave, three-state solver with no resolution of contact waves.

- LLF (Local Lax-Friedrichs) is based on central differences instead of a Riemann problem. It requires no characteristic information. This is the most diffusive of the available three solvers in MUSCL.

- HLLD (Harten-Lax-van Leer with Discontinuities): a 5-wave, six-state solver. HLLD includes two fast waves, two Alfven waves, and one contact discontinuity.

`ReconstructionMethod`: specifies the type of interpolation scheme
used for the left and right states in the Riemann problem.

- PLM:
**default** - PPM: Currently being developed.

### Parameters¶

Parameter file call: `HydroMethod = 4`

## Method 6: MHD with Constrained Transport (CT)¶

`HydroMethod = 6` uses the CT method, which computes an electric field from
the Riemann solver, then uses that electric field to update the magnetic field.

### Parameters¶

Parameter file call: `HydroMethod = 6`